N.J. Senate approves senior housing bill
Published on 9 Jul 2009 at 10:42 am.
1 Comment.
Filed under Local.
by Lisa Fleisher/The Star-Ledger
The state Senate today passed a bill that allows developers to challenge age restrictions on pending developments.
The bill (S-2577), which passed 21-13, allows developers to ask municipalities to reconsider projects that had been approved as senior housing. If the towns don’t open up the buyer pool, developers can take their case to court.
The bill only applies to projects that have not started construction nor sold a unit.
Supporters say this is strictly an economic issue – it’s a type of stimulus to help builders, who have been hit hard by the recession and housing crash, to start working again.
Builders are reluctant to break ground on further senior housing projects because the market has become so overbuilt.
Using statistics from Otteau Valuation Group, builders say there is a 16-year supply in senior housing. That means it will take 16 years to get to a healthy market level of a six-month supply, taking into account all the houses on the market now and all those that are in the pipeline.
The bill had faced opposition from towns that feared losing control over the process and senators who felt it was unfair to allow courts to reverse communities’ decisions.
“This is like a back-door grab for power,” said Sen. Shirley Turner (D-Mercer).
The state’s largest builder, K. Hovnanian, is considering taking some of its planned senior communities in central and southern New Jersey back to towns and trying to get restrictions lifted.
Previous Coverage | N.J. Senate vote could allow courts to overrule towns and open up senior housing
1 Comment to ‘N.J. Senate approves senior housing bill’:
Leave a Reply
Common XHTML tags allowed, which will be validated. Spam and trolling will not be tolerated.
smartguy26 on 10 Jul 2009 at 7:27 pm: 1
I think that its a damn shame that the democratic majority in the senate had the clout to essentially implement a social agenda as far left as this one, without considering the irreversible reprecussions that it will have on the people of new jersey. They just created one more legal loophole in land use legislation.